We have not grasped that the USA and USSR were part of one system, even though they appeared to be adversaries. The quantum relativistic concept of complementarity continues to be intricately entangled with new versions of world totalitarian order. Our problem has been the inability to think ideas complex enough to enable us to understand the mechanisms of the global totalitarian machine that enslaves us. My concern is that Orwellian secret police are likely leaders of those attempting to oppose tyranny. Double cross-stars are the double-agent trademark of totalitarianism that makes it so horrifying. A State-of-illusion takes bows in the light of day, but the terror of its shadow is cast upon those who would rule the night. We feel damned, hypnotized in 1984... a surrealist place where time is paralyzed, and hope is non-existent. Submission is the course of inaction so many choose; but there is another path, a perilous one that leads out of this suicidal despair, but it is not one that can be made easy for those primed to hit on a quick fix. That journey stretches out before you.....

If you wish to understand this book, you should see it whole � and the place to start is the homepage: Heaven-Words copyright 2005 WEBb1910473801 (All rights reserved by the author) You may view any or all chapters of this very long book simply by clicking on the links below.

Fox News Bill O�Reilly Sean Hannity Savage Double Talk Radio with Their Forked Tongue Tales of Islamofascism in Eurabia

Keys To Heaven-Words: The Art And Science Of Revolution

Gordon Press-ing realities in a surreal world

Rise and fall of Roman Catholic Church: revisionist history

Salvador Dali portrays two-timing artists of today: from religious to ideological war with Jewish genius

Quantum theory made easy:  an introduction to the new physics

From String Theory To A Final Theory: Back To The Origins of Nuclear Weapons

Creators of the atomic bomb: debasing nuclear power into a totalitarian order in the new world

Quantum brain theory: splitting classical-physical reality..from the inside-out

Breakdown of madness dawns on genius of collective consciousness

Chaos Theory: gravity bends of spiraling space-time

Emile Durkheim: sacred symbols conceal unholy conviction: believers-in-themselves are sacred..chosen people

Totalitarian science of quantum wholeness -- David Bohm: Krishnamurti or Cusa

The double edge rap of black and white words

In Terror of a Savage Nation - Orwellian nightmare dawns on the West

Cold War origins of totalitarianism in North America and Western Europe 

Consider how difficult it was to get White separatist literature from England and America as recently as 1994. For the past five years I have listened guardedly to Dr. Pierce's weekly lectures on the Internet without difficulty. I don't have time to keep up with all the literature freely available from patriotic sites today. The media and government run campaigns about "hate groups" on the Net, and are determined to shut them down. The basic argument is that these groups incite people to racial hatred, and must be silenced. Most of these groups are actually concerned with something far more abstract than mere bigotry, something media and government refuse to discuss: totalitarianism in the West. This is the first major idea we will examine closely in this book, so it is necessary to define it clearly.

Totalitarianism is a "system of government and ideology in which all social, political, economic, intellectual, cultural, and spiritual activities are subordinated to the purposes of the rulers of a state."3 Older forms of despotism and outright tyranny allowed people to go about their lives undisturbed as long as they did not interfere in the lives of the political elite; in a simpler world, that was possible. Totalitarianism was not actually a reality until the modern age; dependance on the State replaces the self-sufficiency of a free society. The ruling elite govern through their political party. In earlier times, autocratic aristocracies appealed to religious principles to justify their authority. Totalitarian governments included Nazi Germany and Stalin's Soviet Union, but of course not America or "the new world order". "All nongovernmental social groupings are either destroyed totally or coordinated to serve the purposes of the party and the state."4 Monopoly extends beyond business life to include the media, police, and military. "By virtue of the monopoly of mass communications the ruling party and the government are in possession of all channels through which people receive information, guidance, and direction. All newspaper, magazine, and book publishing, as well as radio and television broadcasting, theater productions, and motion pictures, is centrally controlled and directed. All writers, speakers, actors, composers, and poets are enrolled in party-controlled organizations, and they are licensed by the government. Usually they are required to be members of the party. The party line, that is, the party's interpretation of policy, is imposed on all mass media through censorship."5 The totalitarian state can be recognized by its use of secret police, brain washing by means of the media, concentration camps, and the Party. Every modern government attempts to maintain State control of all significantly powerful weapons. "In the totalitarian states, however, which provide no legal means of effecting a change of government, popular revolutions ... have scant prospects of success."6 The fire power of the State far exceeds that of the local peasantry. World conquest is the dream of humble laborers who have no minds of their own, but dutifully serve the will of the State.

In order to effectively attack a modern totalitarian system it is necessary to compromise these elements of monopoly control. For example, nuclear proliferation undermines control of armaments, Internet challenges control of communications, secret police are challenged by local gangs who attack the economy by means of black market trade. What is being proposed in this book is a new ideology to undermine the official pop Party culture. This is indeed a grand ambition, but how does one come by the gall to even think of over-turning a world government? William Pierce reminded me of another man from the Old South: my father. He, more than Pierce or any university professor I have known...excepting one, taught me to think beyond my station in life. I learned not only his ideas, but the lessons of his failures. He was a heroic spirit inspired and constrained by love of country. Patriotism meant an unshakeable loyalty to government institutions, personalities, and the American people. His ideas on race were extreme by anyone's measure, yet he chose to live among Blacks in a way those who fight racism rarely do. However much he despised the liberals, he could find no alternative to relying on the integrity of the conservatives. He could not acknowledge the possibility that they too could betray the trust he and White America placed in them. He found little consolation in the Masons, and none at all in Christianity. My father and I were quite close for many years; he alone turned my thinking away from the pacifist mysticism of my hippie daze toward the military, politics, and the volatile ideas of race.... and most importantly, he taught me his own philosophy which was based on an understanding of collective consciousness. While my thinking was radicalized by encountering Gordon Press, my writing and intellectual development were inspired by our regular correspondences. He introduced me to the anti-Semitic ideas of The Protocols of The Learned Elders Of Zion in the early 1970's....but they made no impression at the time ..yet never-the-less remained � unforgotten. My father later decided to support the Jews rather than trying to resist them. Around 1993, we quarreled over the subject of the Jews. He saw them as the only people capable of ruling America and eventually the world; without their genius, he feared the West could not successfully rival an ascendant Asia. He welcomed them as America's new patricians. As he aged, the racism of his earlier years faded with the weakening of his mental and physical strength. He died in 1994, still living at the Black on White border of America's leading city. The following is by and large one of the last letters written to my father:

Your recent letter about Zhirinovsky was interesting.... People here are not completely taken in by the Jewish "Hitler". It appears that the rise of real anti-Semitic fascists in Russia, Eastern Europe, and even Western Europe has made it necessary to give them a "safe" leader who can "represent them", a former KGB man and Jewish activist no less. His mission is to discredit the extreme right wing in Europe by frightening neighboring countries, particularly Germany and Poland, with threats of bombing and domination. Any good Polish or German patriot must be against this "new Hitler" and his allies in their own countries. Native fascists now are guilty by association with this threat to European peace. The Jews in Russia, and the rest of Europe, seem to think that if they cannot prevent the reawakening of fascism then perhaps they can abort the new ideology by creating a "Hitler" of their own to attack fascism from within. If you listen to what Zhirinovsky says, it is plain that his ideas are inconsistent and far from being anti-Semitic. The Jews in Russia want nothing more than a good excuse to be allowed admission into Western Europe and the United States. The Jews are subtle (shrewd) and not straight forward; they play games all the time. Zhirinovsky is just the cold war game warmed over, with a new mask. The objective is to create division in Europe -- between Europeans. The real Nazis in Europe want an alliance among all European countries, especially Russia and Germany, not World War III. They want to force Africans, Asians, Jews, Moslems and other non-Europeans out of Europe; the last thing in the world they want is another world war in which Whites are killing other Whites. You see they are racists and fear that the White race is in danger of extermination by the world�s multitudes of non-whites who out number them by four to one. Zhirinovsky, on the other hand, does not hesitate to suggest that Russia will destroy the German people, and the Poles with them. This is Zhirinovsky the Jew speaking, and not some new Hitler. It is true that there are Nazis in Russia and that the military is sympathetic to them; I am convinced they will not allow this Zhirinovsky charade to go on for long.

The media in Russia is controlled by the Jews, as in the U.S.A.. They have created Zhirinovsky. Before the parliamentary elections around 1992, they had a special nation-wide program about him on TV. It was supposedly critical of him, but "accidentally" made him into "the embattled outsider struggling against the corrupt system", and gave him an enormous popular vote. The Jews know how to create heroes; they have been doing it in Hollywood for a long time. Real nationalists are ignored or treated harshly by the media. Zhirinovsky is made into a cult figure, not so different from Stalin. Former hard line communists, who admired Stalin and Lenin, are quick to support Zhirinovsky. Make no mistake about it, Zhirinovsky is the instrument of the Jews, and is definitely no Nazi. In an interview on the American CNN TV (January 8, 1994), he talked about Americans exterminating the Indians, much as the Germans exterminated the Jews, and then went on to say that Russians were not guilty of such mass murders -- and the American interviewer...... did not challenge him on the point. As you know, anywhere from twenty to sixty million people died in the Stalinist Gulags prior to and after World War II; this is what Alexander Solzhenitsyn was writing about; he spent about ten years in a communist concentration camp. This "detail of history", as opposed to the "Holocaust" in which six million Jews died, seemed to have slipped the minds of both Zhirinovsky and his sensitive female interviewer. You can be absolutely certain that no real Russian Patriot would have forgotten the tens of millions of his countrymen, probably including some of his own relatives, who died at the hands of the Communists ....let alone strike up an alliance with their murderers.

The April 17, 1988 edition of The Sunday Times of London has a story on the front page stating that the "Soviets admit Stalin killed 50m", that is 50 million people. This is the first and last I have heard of this story. The whole charge seemed to disappear from public attention, as though it was not news worthy. At the same time, there are endless stories about Nazi war crimes from 50 years ago. Elderly war criminals are hunted down and put on public trial, which is broadcast on every TV screen around the world. World public opinion focuses on the scandal of Swiss banks, their guilty Nazi gold, and the billions of dollars that must be paid in compensation to the Jews. The sins of the past are not to be forgotten. The lessons of the Holocaust must be learned by a new generation. "Never again" has become the golden rule. Yet, why is the world willing to overlook the tens of millions of Eastern Europeans murdered by the Stalinists? The press knows, yet remains silent..... almost. Why did this story of Stalin killing 50 million East Europeans appear at all? Only to be dropped? Not a word in the American News magazines or on BBC radio. Yet, people in the West believe they are free, and trust that their constitutions guarantee them "freedom of the press". What is the Orwellian secret lurking in the shadows? It has been in the interest of those in power, both in the former Soviet Union and the United States, to portray the events of Hitler's Nazi Germany as the greatest evil that has ever befallen humanity. To suggest that a far greater war crime occurred in the Soviet Union, and goes unnoticed even to the present day, is unacceptable. The terrifying secret is that nations, particularly Super-States, are "cannibalistic" -- they murder their own populations! This is a critically urgent reality to face when confronting the formation of the ultimate Super-State: the new capitalist/socialist world order.

I have raised the matter of the tens of millions of Europeans murdered by the communists because I thought one of them might be related to you.....that you might care. The general reaction one gets in Europe when raising this delicate matter is uneasiness.... As the guardians of Europe's moral conscience might say: "We Swedes don't discuss such questions" -- and this in a tone of moral indignation. Of course only a few tens of thousands died, is the response of some -- relegating the matter to a minor issue; or if there were more, than they were only communists killing other communists and that may have even been all for the better. But those few willing to acknowledge awareness that many millions died will aggressively point out that at least as many, and most likely more, people of color through out the world have died at the hands of European and American imperialists. The great tragedy then is the genocide committed by Whites against people of color, and we must not allow ourselves to become distracted from this central matter by focusing on a secondary issue involving unfortunate events from long ago in the days of the now non-existent Soviet Union. Such morally righteous defenders of socialist "idealism" fail to notice that it is the White populations of Europe and America that are decreasing at a frightful rate, and the third world populations that are many times greater than they ever were, and increasing.

The lesson the Jews learned from the Holocaust was that a group must not trust "The State" and that it is much better to die fighting than to go to death docilely. And this is precisely the lesson that Super-States do not want their populations to learn. This, I believe, is the reason why the Stalinist mass murders are ignored -- because many other groups of ordinary people have been exterminated, and they may have saved themselves if only they had known enough to fight. Even a Super State requires the co-operation of its population to function, but the lesson of modern history is that "The State" cannot be trusted, especially not large and powerful ones.

John Sack is a Jewish writer from New York. His February 1997 speech at the Holocaust Museum in Washington was cancelled. It did not focus on Jews as victims of German war criminals, but rather on the theme of revenge by former concentration camp prisoners against German civilians, including many women and children. Sack wrote a book titled An Eye for An Eye: The Untold story of Jewish Revenge Against Germans in 1945. He asserts that Jews have a duty to speak out against the crime of genocide regardless of whom the guilty party may be. "Sack contends 60,000 to 80,000 ethnic Germans died from 1945 to 1948 at internment camps Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin set up through the Polish Communist government's Office of State Security, whose operators included many Jews."7 This is similar to what Alexander Solzhenitsyn has been saying for decades, with a minor exception: it was not sixty thousand people who died in such camps, but closer to sixty million! Sixty thousand is not half the one hundred and thirty-five thousand German civilians, mostly women and children, who died in the fire-bombing of Dresden at the close of World War II. If six million Jews died in German camps, how likely is it that the Old Testament "eye for and eye" justice would be satisfied by the execution of sixty thousand Germans, or even ten times that number? A Jew, such as John Sack, is willing to confess this genocide committed by Jews so as to minimize the damage...make it into a small Clintonesque type issue, and then close the book on this messy matter, thus avoiding a potentially much more serious charge of mass murder on a scale beyond even the power of Hollywood and the Anti-Defamation League to justify.

Traveling throughout Europe has made me acutely aware of the hardship White peoples endure in the East. During the communist era, loyal party members would visit Helsinki by train to stock up on Western products, or strike up a deal with local trading partners. Ordinary people in the Soviet Union did not have such freedom to go on shopping vacations. In the best stores of Helsinki, Russian was a third language. This is certain. I suspect the same occurred on a much grander scale in Berlin. My belief in this speculation was strengthened while chatting on the Internet with a knowledgeable person from Germany, who explained that, this in fact did occur in Berlin. Visiting Berlin, especially the eastern half, has been one of the most heart-rending experiences of my life. To understand what I am talking about, you would have needed to see the incredible wealth of West Berlin, side by side with the slums and misery of the eastern half -- all in the middle of Eastern Germany. Are we supposed to believe that the West Berliners were so industrious and hard working that they repaired their part of the city, but their cousins on the other side of "the wall" were so lazy it never occurred to them to repair their homes, which were demolished in the war? Then ask the crucial question: for whom did the stores of West Berlin stock their luxurious products? It looked something like Zurich, or Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills. Why were many of the finest shops on Earth located in the middle of a communist no-man's land? Certainly not only for the "born-guilty" local West Berliners. East Germans were shot if they tried to enter this oddly located western half of a mercilessly bombed-out city. The eastern half still lay in rubble nearly half a century after the war, except of course the Jewish synagogue that was fully restored, gold leaf and all. I doubt that West Germans traveled to East Germany to do their luxury shopping -- it just was not in good taste, at least not in numbers to have made West Berlin such a prosperous city. During holidays, West Germans were allowed to visit the East and bring gifts to their imprisoned relatives, but this alone could not support the economy of West Berlin the whole year. In addition to the occupying American military troops, it was the loyal communist party members who were privileged to shop in this materialistic paradise at the heart of communist Eastern Europe. The point is that anyone visiting in a border territory, such as Helsinki or West Berlin, knew of the secret arrangements that existed between supposed adversaries in the communist East and the capitalist West during the "cold-war" era. It is my belief that West Berlin existed as a major tourist center primarily for the benefit of Soviet communist party members who needed a well earned break from enslaving and murdering their own countrymen, and of course as compensation for betraying their friends and relatives. These are my impressions and not those of a scholar. I know Berlin was largely rebuilt thanks to government subsidies from the rest of West Germany, that Berlin has historically been Germany's seat of government and largest population center. As a child, I heard about Check-Point Charlie, the Berlin airlift, and John Kennedy's famous visit. But I also know of the deception built around an undeclared war with Viet Nam, a conflict that had entirely different objectives than those declared by presidents or reported on the evening news. I am simply not a believer in either official news or history. Consider that war to "contain communism" in the light of Clinton's close alliance with communist/capitalist China in 1998, and the American government's new policy toward China: non-containment. Events do indeed happen, but their meaning is rarely what we are led to believe. I have learned to use my own eyes, and trust less than half of what I see. While distrusting European politicians, I am never-the-less pleased to have witnessed the fragmentation of the Soviet Union and the unification of Germany; and hope to see the rebuilding not only of East Berlin, but also of all Eastern Europe .....including Russia.

For some years now, whenever engaging in a discussion with anyone, I have raised the following question: Why is it that people in Europe and America can be so forgiving of the mass murders by communists, yet so mercilessly determined to track down every last nazi who may have killed a Jew in World War II? One does not suggest in polite society that communists responsible for murdering tens of millions of Europeans, many after World War II, should be sought out and put on trial for crimes against humanity; to make such a suggestion would brand a person as a fascist, if not an outright nazi. As I see it, all claims to international justice rest on the principle of equal justice before the law. Communists who commit mass murder are just as guilty as nazis, and both should be punished equally if the law is to be respected. However, because the law is not impartial as it would claim to be, courts have no authority other than brute power. Even when people recognize this injustice, they still are willing to support a society that is pro-communist and anti-nazi. Why? While traveling from Estonia, I asked these questions of a Finnish student interested in political science, who would soon take up studies at a London university. Unlike most people I have met, he was willing to think the question over seriously, and offered the following explanation: the crimes of nazism arise from the ideology itself; it speaks of exterminating inferior races and leaving the world to "the master race". Communism does not advocate such racial hatred; on the contrary, it encourages peoples of all races to live together in peace. This is not to say that Europeans have not felt horror and anger with regard to the death camps that existed in the Soviet Union, but the blame they feel falls squarely upon "the damned Russians". In other words, Stalin corrupted the good intentions of honorable communists like Trotsky, whom he murdered, and turned it into something terrible. Orwell says much the same thing in Animal Farm. Hitler did not simply distort nazism; he carried out its ideology perfectly. The conclusion then is that there is nothing inherent to Communism that would result in a repeat of this Russian disaster, whereas, those who espouse nazism will inevitably follow in Hitler's foot steps. This is a very logical perspective, and has been the view of many intellectuals for the past few decades. There is a very subtle issue operating here. It involves the appearance of harmlessness, or even goodness. And it is on these same grounds that we challenge the integrity of Christianity. Just as with the Christian conquerors of by-gone days, supporters of communism, socialism, and democracy all claim to love peace and mean harm to no one. People want to believe that they are good, and their values are honorable. So it is necessary to persuade the supporters of the most ruthless ideologies that they are innocent lovers of humanity. But the world is not what it appears to be. Melville's dark vision in Moby Dick is correct: the most horrifying evil is that which would cloak itself in the innocence and silence of the lamb. You may be unable to comprehend how anyone could reject Christian Socialism or the "love" and pacifism it preaches. Most people do not have either the heart or stomach to confront spiritual corruption, but we must, for this is the age-old mechanism, created by the "good Jews", which is killing us softly with kindness, where more obvious methods have had only limited success. Those preaching "love" and tolerance in the West do not care to remember the communist crusade demanding that the proletariat rise up and eliminate the bourgeois by all means necessary; and that today, increasingly, it is the lower White middle class which produces the dreaded "nazis" whom the down-trodden multi-racial lovers of democracy are attacking, with the financial, political, and media support of the Zionist upper classes. From their perspective, killing "nazis" is not quite the same thing as killing decent people. It is more like executing criminals.... a hard but necessary duty of any civilized society. In fact, it may even be virtuous since we are ridding the world of hate and easing the minds of those too often their targets. This insight raises a most astonishing resolution to the moral question we have struggled with concerning "the world's" failure to punish mass murders by the communists of Stalin's era. What if the tens of millions killed by the "Russians" were actually nazis or nearly nazis, and not innocent victims at all? Was there even a crime committed? Ask yourself this question: considering the genocidal objectives of nazism, would it have been morally wrong to have killed Hitler when he was just a mere rabble-rouser, long before he had the opportunity to gas six million Jews? But how do you know which one of the rabble-rousers is Hitler when making a "first strike"? Is there not a moral imperative to "take-out" all possible "Hitlers"? Have we not been mistaken focusing on the guilty dead instead of noticing those potential victims who are still the innocent living? Is it not likely that the communists who manned the Gulags were actually heroes, and no villains at all? You can be certain they saw themselves that way, especially if they happened to be "Russian" Jews, as Solzhenitsyn's books suggest!

In 1997, an important development in France was reported throughout the European press. Articles cited a book on the top of the French best-seller�s list: The Black Book of Communism. Many prominent historians, primarily French, contributed to this work. The leading author is the historian Stephane Courtois. They estimate that Communist governments throughout the world are responsible for the killing of about 85 million people, with 20 million of those victims coming from the former Soviet Union. They argue that mass starvation was an intended method of killing Ukrainians in the 1930s. They maintain that communism is a criminal ideology fully comparable to nazism. Courtois suggests that responsible communists should face international trials based on the model of the Nuremberg trials which prosecuted the nazis. The issues of this book, and its popularity, made the media cover it on a daily basis. Le Monde sought to dismiss these passionate charges against communism as old news that they covered between 1950 and 1970. The Prime Minister, Lionel Jospin, had been pressed to defend the communist ministers he appointed to his government. My only point is that this matter has been forced into open public debate in France. As the Jews use their international media and governmental influences to press multi-billion dollar claims for the restoration of nazi gold, real estate, art, stocks, etc., public opinion in much of Europe will turn as strongly against them as the Arab world already has. We can be certain that should the hunt for guilty communists reach the fever pitch demonstrated by the Simon Weisenthals of the past decades, the avenging angels of this new "truth and reconciliation commission" will arrive at many door-posts stained with the human blood of countless sacrificial lambs. By 1999, a group calling itself a "truth commission" was actually established by the president of Estonia; he was responding to democratic cries for equal justice gaining popularity among the long enslaved Baltic peoples. In order to assure international support for his country�s efforts to bring the atrocities of communism to light, this predictable politician appointed a Jewish dignitary from a neighboring "neutral country" to head the investigation. To give this team of "moral authorities" the benefit of experienced hands, and consequently even greater "credibility", the commission was charged with seeking out both the crimes of the nazis as well as the communists, starting in 1940 and concluding with the collapse of the Soviet Union.

This is not to say that nazism, communism and modern democracies are not all totalitarian; we will examine the methods of contemporary Media-States throughout the forth-coming chapters. The primary distinction between the nazis and the communists is whom they targeted for killing. The nazis attacked those who were not Germans..... the invaders -- the outsiders; their objective was to create a homogeneous fatherland for ordinary German people. However, they were expansionist and their racist ideology encouraged them to execute people they believed were not full-blooded Europeans. In addition to attacking those they saw as racial inferiors, they evidently felt less love and devotion for those Poles and Slavs who did not inspire their respect; yet as we shall see they did not object to an alliance with Mussolini's Italy. By and large, the communists killed passively by starvation....much as the British allowed one million Irish to die of starvation and disease as a direct consequence of the Great Potato Famine of the 1840's, with no thought of Christian charity; the communists used exposure to the Siberian winter as an "innocent" means of murdering millions in their labor camps; and then there were simply those who mysteriously disappeared --- who is to know or be accountable when no corpse is found? Perhaps they just "fled" somewhere else more to their liking, not caring to leave a forwarding address. The indirect methods of the communists failed to horrify the Christian conscience the way the direct methods of the Germans did. The communists created an empire by swallowing up neighboring countries; and once "peace" was established, proceeded to stalk ordinary citizens within the ever expanding Soviet Union. This resulted in a general feeling of terror within the society..... Talk about "the silence of the lambs...." Ordinary Germans had little to fear from the Gestapo if they weren't conspiring with aliens; the nazis were trying to preserve the Aryan race, and the majority of the German population enthusiastically supported them. People of every ethnic group, particularly those who were successful in their labors, had much to fear from a communist system of secret police that literally transformed their nations into prisons, from which there was no "fleeing to the promised land" unless the "victims of persecution" were lucky enough to be "chosen".

Christianity died with the tens of millions of Russian Orthodox Christians who were "obedient unto death", the sacrificial lambs of atheistic communism. The churches today are aware of the mass extermination of their own devout members by the victorious communists before and after World War II; and have chosen to remain silent...turning a blind "eye" toward this atrocity, even calling upon the victims in Eastern Europe to forgive the now reformed communists -- while falling in line with the Jews preaching the eternal guilt of the Germans and other Whites the world over for the truly great sins of anti-Semitism and racism. It is their missionary zeal that spearheads campaigns to bring the poor suffering potential Christians of Africa and the whole third world into the heartland of the West. These opportunists, who advocate the multi-racial, homosexual policies of one world government, are the "Paul-bearers" of a dead religion. It is my intent to bring Christians face to face with the consequences of their cowardly faith, and force them, along with church leaders like the disgraced Billy Graham who begged forgiveness from the Jews for speaking the truth with President Nixon, to finally take responsibility for their silence and inaction concerning the mass murder of European Christians by Jewish inspired communists....To understand that this self-serving alliance with mass murderers is the unforgivable offence responsible for the death of their Judeo-Christian religion. Like the communists, they are indirectly responsible for the atrocities of Eastern Europe and those taking place in America and all of Europe today. They claim a moral authority which they have long since lost. A few rebel Christians have dared engage in a real conflict with the official governments on the battleground of abortion; but this struggle is limited. Christians see little difference in protecting the unborn of Blacks, Chinese, Latins, Indians -- and Whites. Theirs' is a pious mission to save race-less souls, and has nothing to do with assuring the survival of the people of European Christian ancestry. There would be stiff opposition to suggestions that abortion in the over-populated third world is outside the jurisdiction of their moral righteousness. Overall, Christianity has lost credibility and any spiritual potency it may have once had. Those Christian soldiers truly dedicated to saving their nations must do so without the blessing of institutional Christianity; Christian soldiers today must be Christian in name only. The official Churches have long since betrayed and condemned them. The Jews have been key players in a brutal communist assault on White Christians of the West; yet the pious meekly abandon their own intelligence and follow Church and Bible in idealizing the God of Israel and His "Chosen People". It is this kind of mindlessness that compelled Nietzsche to charge Christianity with fostering a slave mentality, and led him to declare that God is dead. Christian loyalty to the Jewish Book is not only a betrayal of their own faithful, who died under the watchful care of Jewish Bolsheviks, but an abandonment of their own children to a dangerous acceptance of Biblical apocalypse.

Where-ever one goes in America, Jewish interests prevail ....starting with fundamentals: The Bible. "God" is perceived to be a Jew, Jesus Christ; and the Jews, however wayward at times, are "His Chosen People". This religious myth is of immeasurable importance. Jewish influence over the minds of Christians is insurmountable, and can now be broken only by ceasing to be Christian. These opening pages are difficult to write because there is almost nothing of substance that can be said which does not sound to your ears like propaganda. Perhaps William Pierce and his compatriots have carried out their missions too well. But this book is not a primer in neo-nazi doctrine, nor am I an apologist for past atrocities. While rejecting Christianity, I will often appeal to those aspects of Christian culture which are timeless, much as the early Church sought to preserve the best of "pagan" Greek and Roman culture; even Jewish thought will be respected from time to time. In a similar way, the ideas and passions of Nazism will also be brought to life so as to illuminate something new under the sun.

For most of the past century, Jews have monopolized the world's media, from the highest ranking Newhouse book publishing and newspaper chains.... allied to the New York Times and Washington Post --- to your local daily news. Magazines are all in the bag too, ranging from respectable names like Newsweek and U.S. News and World Report to the lowest levels of scandalous journalism and the perversions of hard core pornography. They have shaped the views of the most sophisticated members of society right down to the most ignorant and naive. By 1998, international mergers, combined with multinational corporations, make it increasingly difficult to identify Jewish influence.     For example, Random House has apparently been sold to a German conglomerate. Who the "German" owners are is by no means clear; but what is certain is that the pro-Jewish bias will persist, and multi-cultural policies intensify. The once honored and trusted name of Disney, now under Jewish control, has become a symbol for pro-homosexual campaigns, and the multi-racial standard for our children's entertainment. ... and ABC news the shaper of our opinions. AOL-Time-Warner is the largest and most powerful media empire in the world; with regard to their well named one-Time-partner Ted Turner, the pro-Jewish bias of CNN was over-turned in 2002. The Times are-a-changin. For an update read Chapter 1984 -- Waking up to a Savage nightmare in an Orwellian Nation: Michael Savage and Alex Jones compared. Jewish control of business and the legal profession have been legendary, and their home base is Manhattan. Wall Street and the banking industry, starting with the Federal Reserve chairman, have been their traditional conservative financial control center. Should one then look to the "opposition" leftist liberal camp, one encounters Jews in leadership positions as lawyers, intellectuals, and entertainers "fighting the establishment". Jews, like Marx and Trotsky, originated communism and maintained control of the American-Soviet system throughout much of the century by means of double agents such as Armand Hammar and Robert Maxwell -- Billionaire tycoons in the West...communist bosses in the East. The cold war made the splitting of Europe into a profitable arms business. The universities have been dominated by the ideas of Zionist intellectuals from Einstein and Freud to the post-modernists. Law and medicine are fully incorporated into this totalitarian empire, as are retail business and advertising. The influence of the "Jewish lobby" has a fearful reputation in Washington. No one crosses the interests of Israel for long, and lives politically. As has been the case in Europe since 1945, it is becoming a crime to criticize Jews in America. Those more knowledgeable than myself understand that this is but the briefest of summaries, and that it would take many dozens of books to do justice to such an investigation.

If all this sounds like a stale conspiracy theory, consider that we will soon examine theoretical physics in order to give credibility to the ideas being presented here. Among the objectives of that exploration will be an understanding of what are called principles of symmetry. "A symmetry principle is simply a statement that something looks the same from certain different points of view. Of all such symmetries, the simplest is the approximate bilateral symmetry of the human face."8 Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity is an example of a symmetry principle; the idea is that the constant motion of the observer is of no significance when conducting scientific experiments. "The laws of nature also appear to take the same form to observers moving at different constant velocities; it makes no difference whether we do our experiments here in the solar system, whizzing around the center of the galaxy at hundreds of kilometers per second, or in a distant galaxy rushing away from our own at tens of thousands of kilometers per second."9A This concept was based on the experimental observation that the speed of light remains constant, even from the perspectives of multiple observers traveling at different speeds. Einstein departed from Newton's perception of gravitation and redefined gravity in terms of his own symmetry principle of General Relativity, which states that physical laws will remain unchanged regardless of how we situate our positions of observation in space and time.9B Totalitarianism is understandable as a principle of symmetry. Perhaps this idea is being introduced prematurely, but it is so essential to the game-plan that it must be played before its time. This book also contains symmetry principles. One of these symmetry principles is similar to Einstein's principles of relativity.... and might be called: The Symmetry Principle of Jewish Totalitarianism. It goes like this: In the structure of world power from 1945 to 1999, where-ever you look, from Eastern and Western Europe, as well as North and South America, South Africa and the Middle East -- to the stock markets and currency markets of Asia ....you will find Jewish influence prevails. As with Einstein's symmetry principle, it does not matter from which perspective you view society: media, law, government, politics, nuclear weapons production, psychiatry, entertainment, banking, history, communism, capitalism, the academia of arts and sciences ...social sciences, crime, religion --- all tolerated perspectives will be illuminated by the light of the same revelation ...that the Jews integrate and control all these activities. It is the monopolistic, monotheistic omnipresent quality of Zionist totalitarianism that lends itself so completely to relativistic thinking. What conspiracy theorists are trying to do is to identify symmetries, to prove that some central fact remains unchanged whichever way we turn: "they" are always concealed at the core of this complex world of changing perspectives. As will become painfully clear over the course of our long passage, "they" are the Jews. A principle of symmetry is so fundamental that it is able to serve as a skeleton key that can unlock many doors. Should you truly understand such a basic idea, it becomes possible to learn many new and complex concepts very quickly because you immediately recognize that initially unfamiliar ideas also have the same symmetry principle at their foundation. As we shall see, the search by scientists for a "theory of everything" is a search for principles of symmetry.

Because this symmetry principle of Jewish Totalitarianism is modeled on a scientific principle of symmetry, it is testable by those tough minded sports fans willing to challenge what the psychologist Ratibor Jurjevich has identified as a "fear of the Jews syndrome". This is a real taboo in America and more so in Europe. Many people know the Jews have enormous wealth and power, but they don't have the courage to say one word of criticism, even as the Jews extort billions of dollars from banks, business, and tax payers. Instead, people direct their anger toward safer targets, like: racists, heretics, witches, and devils. This "holy" status of the Jews must be brought into the light of critical examination, and not allowed to remain in the shelter of our "guilty" minds. While not referring to this fear of the Jews syndrome, the prominent theoretical physicist David Bohm acknowledged that certain taboos are at the heart of every society. "Creativity, in almost every area of Iife, is blocked by a wide range of rigidly held assumptions that are taken for granted by society as a whole.... every society holds additional assumptions that are of such a shaky nature that they are not even admitted into discussion. There is therefore an unspoken requirement that everyone must subscribe to these assumptions, but that no one should ever mention that any such assumptions indeed exist. They are tacitly denied as operating within society, and even this denial is denied."10 People are forced to distort many of their ideas in order to avoid taboo areas that are at the heart of everyone's activities. The best these conformists can do is collude with one another to steer clear of forbidden territory. It is obvious that such taboos are destructive of free expression. I must emphasize that taboos are strictly enforced in the sciences, education, entertainment, business, government, military, sports, churches, etc. -- everywhere in the "free world". Bohm, a Jew, was referring to deeply held racist feelings which cultured Whites won't acknowledge, but of course these taboos must be brought into the open so that society can stop '"playing false" and become truly creative in an honest multi-racial society.

Political correctness takes priority over scientific "objectivity", but of course scientists are obligated to say that it doesn't. "It is surely better to accept a system of thought that sets uncompromising standards of skepticism and objectivity, even if it can only provide a partial description of reality, than to retreat into an uncritical acceptance of dogma. That is not to say that there is no place for religion, of course -- so long as religion restricts itself to those questions that lie outside the scope of science."11 This is a claim that has become ludicrous in a world where political power shapes scientific expression. The scientist bends his knee and the truth just as readily as any Anglican homosexual bishop. For instance, the dogma of racial equality is not open to the "uncompromising standards of skepticism and objectivity" scientists are so proud of claiming. William Shockley and a colleague shared the Nobel prize for inventing the transistor. While a professor of Engineering at Stanford University in 1973, he published an article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.12 The article presented a very rigorous scientific study of population genetics. But the scientific community responded in sympathy to the crowds of revolutionary Blacks, outraged by the boldness of his brand of thinking, who were rioting and burning cities from coast to coast for close to a decade. Scientists were about as willing to look through his telescope ....discuss his findings --- as the French government, in 1997, was to give parliamentary seats to the racist National Front after they won 18% of the vote --- One seat for the National Front, 30 seats and two ministerial positions for the communists, who took only 10% of the vote. Months later, a campaign was launched by conservative leaders to remove even this one representative ....they determined that even one White French patriot was too offensive for even the ever tolerant democratic French to suffer. By the Spring of 2000, the mood of Europe became apprehensive because the Austrians proved themselves to be more courageous than their European neighbors in the exercise of democracy �and for this they were still being punished. As long as Vienna gives a voice to those opposed to increasing alien immigration into their mountainous domain, Austria will be treated as a political out-cast by the freedom loving democracies of the European Union. Science, like democracy, no longer tolerates freedom of expression and does not represent those people who disagree with government policy. To speak of scientific objectivity as though it were a virtue is like assuring someone that the following proceedings will all be carried out in a completely legal way. Anyone who would take comfort in the integrity of the legal system is a fool. Science, like the law, always serves those who hold the power of wealth and plan on keeping it.

It is not possible to discard just part of a totalitarian world view; it is necessary to discard the whole thing. That's the way these "winner takes all" games you so love are played. We become "total" disbelievers. This is a real atheism. We are not speaking about simply denying belief in "God", we are talking about denying a totalitarian paradigm of reality that includes "God" as one of its components. Such disbelief is beyond the capacity of most of us to imagine, but it will happen. We will be overwhelmed by our disenchantment.

The democratic "free world", in which people believe, is a very rough place. Laws, justice, and morality are all of little real consequence. Rich Americans have the best lawyers and politicians the market will bear. Without money, you are nothing. Raw power defines morality, justice, and the proper concerns of State and vassal Churches. To talk about corruption discloses a profound lack of insight into the inner workings of "this world". Trend setters advance themselves by enthusiastically supporting the latest campaigns of the power elite: Zionism, capitalist-communism, the drug culture of the 1960's or the police raids of the 90's, feminism, homosexuality, racial equality, abortion, euthanasia, multi-culturalism .....political correctness. These aggressive in-your-face types simultaneously observe a strict code of silence concerning Jewish tyranny. There are no enduring values, save self enrichment. The transvestite Euro-song contest winning pop-star of 1998 from Israel best symbolizes this society of "r�al politic".

The "real world order" is ruled by a chain of Mafias, as is self evident in some countries such as Italy and Russia. The Italian government, including the former prime minister Julio Andrioti, is routinely embarrassed by disclosures revealing strong ties between government officials and the Italian Mafia. News of a former Italian Prime Minister being on trial for corruption or suspected murder no longer shocks the citizenry. After the fall of Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines decades ago, the U.S. military enabled him to loot that poor nation's treasury of what his successor was to estimate to be about five billion U.S. dollars, and transport those stolen assets to Hawaii and other destinations. "Strongmen" just as corrupt as Marcos, from Black African nations to Indonesia, have been allies and friends of major political and economic powers for a reason: they play syndicate ball. Japanese and German leaders have been faced with similar scandals in recent years. Even the Catholic Church has been involved in the corrupt dealings of its' Vatican bank. Any devout tourist to Rome cannot fail to be astonished by the Banco de Santo Spiritu. The figurehead leaders of nations are manipulated by media-sainted godfathers, who can twist the law to their own "interpretation". In 1993, news reports from "democratic Russia" would openly speak of billions of western aid dollars disappearing; they claimed the Russian Mafia insiders simply stole the money, and the same thing continued into 1998 amidst the economic collapse of that much abused nation. Anyone imagining that the massive debts of nations are the result of honest mistakes must be a government employee. But what is not obvious to many is that chief among the insider traders is the Zionist Mafia -- which operates as brutally, in secret, outside of Israel as it does against the Palestinians within its own "self declared security zone". But more importantly, major nations of the world, such as the U.S.A. and former U.S.S.R., have been controlled by this mother of all Mafias. The image of Mafia only faintly describes the Stalinist terror and the communist domination of Eastern Europe. Anywhere from twenty to sixty million people died in Soviet labor camps during the Stalin years. Western leaders, from Truman onwards, would seek to repress information about these atrocities, or distance themselves from overt communist brutality through claims of a cold war. They were fighting against an "evil empire", as Ronald Reagan would say. The Party has become the respectable facade for the Mafia. Billionaire Godfathers like Robert Maxwell and Armand Hammar, along with too many Goodmen and con-men to mention, have been the lords of this century. This is totalitarianism in our time and in our homelands.

The fundamental tactic of the Jews is an unacknowledged cold-war collaboration between "bad Jews" and "good Jews" for the subversive objective of dividing and conquering a cohesive society. This tag-team match uses "push" technology to corrupt a community, as in pushing drugs, sexual perversion on the net, political and financial mis-representation etc. ...suckering everyman into his own secret guilt and consequent vulnerability to the law. The "good-cops" intentionally fail in another much publicized war to defeat their assumed enemies now here on the home-front: the pushers and Cong-artists. The media makes out-laws the in-siders of popular culture, so much so that "bad" becomes the only way to be ...anybody. The youth are twisted and come to understand that they must turn back upon themselves in order to succeed ....to prey upon their own kind -- to be self-destructive. Those with right power left ....trust no one whom they cannot prove guilty of a serious moral offense on the six o�clock news, whom they cannot hang-out to dry should an uncoordinated player step-out-side party lines. Dirty dancing is the order of the day. However stiff the opposition, the old champions of re-fashioned morality finally become all the rage. The righteous representatives of the State waste no time pushing reprobate back-slides into Hell fires. Yesterday�s revelers are found to be out of step with those who take pride in marching lock-step ...in time to the beat of the oldest fashioned Cains and straw polls. Stalinism is offered as a patriotic salvation for a nation tormented by the corruption of liberal social-democracy.

Immanuel Wallerstein's book Geopolitics and Geoculture states: "It was the genius of Roosevelt and of Stalin to have found the formula, for good or ill, that would permit this collaboration of symbiotically linked presumed ideological enemies. The formula is what we have popularly called Yalta....."13 ".... Each ideological discourse sustained the other, and neither was plausible without the other."14 This type of geopolitical thinking had its origins in quantum theory. Later we will clearly link quantum theory and the creators of the atom bomb to the structure of world power. Our problem has been the inability to think ideas complex enough to enable us to understand the mechanisms of the totalitarian machine that has enslaved us. We have not grasped that the U.S.A. and U.S.S.R. were part of one system..... even though they appeared to be adversaries. The concept of complementarity is at the heart of quantum theory's mystery, and was the insight of the guiding intelligence behind both quantum theory and the atom bomb: Neils Bohr, a wealthy Danish Jew. As we shall go to great pains to demonstrate, relativity and quantum theory are intricately intertwined with the structure of real world totalitarian power. "Bohr extended the idea of wave--particle duality into something known as the principle of complementarity, which recognizes that seemingly incompatible physical qualities might be complementary rather than contradictory. Thus the wave and particle nature of electrons can be regarded as complementary aspects of a single reality, like the two sides of a coin. ..."15 Wallerstein dropped the bombshell by disclosing that: "The Cold War permitted each side, in the name of Americanism and Leninism, to keep tight order in their camps, to clean house as they saw fit, and to reorient the mentalities of the future generations....". "....It is this intimate collusion of the Wilsonian and Leninist versions of universalizing liberalism that accounted for the ease with which the US-USSR collusion could establish itself (behind the facade of enmity). It accounts as well for the ease with which (and the correctness with which) the rebels of 1968 could put the two regimes and the two ideologies in the same basket."16 This means that all the political leaders throughout the world have been deceiving their cold-war-military-budget-tax-payers for decades. It means that the media and the universities, along with the Churches, have lied on a trillion grand scale. Instead of fighting the "Russians", loyal Americans were standing with Senator Joe McCarthy, who was valiantly battling the communists in the American government and the media. But the righteous leaders of society did not support "McCarthyism". They let the media destroy Joe McCarthy, and we are left to suffer the consequent totalitarian one world government decades later.

There seem to be ideas so fearful that people are unable to think them, or even understand should the facts be laid-out squarely before them; intellectuals turn away in horror if someone should be so inconsiderate as to confront them with the real taboo subjects in society. The power of the Jews, over many centuries, is clearly such a phenomenon. But this matter of Jewish power is not limited to the confines of the Bible and Churches; it enters our daily lives in a far more menacing incarnation. A book released in 1994 titled: Special Tasks: The Memoirs Of An Unwanted Witness -- A Soviet Spymaster by Pavel Anatolievich Sudoplatov, asserts that the leaders of the Manhattan Project, J. Robert Oppenheimer, Fermi, and Bohr passed nuclear weapons secrets directly to the Soviet Union while the atom bomb was being created.17 The implications of such actions make a farce of the cold war and the people who believed in it; such treachery requires that any halfway decent human being do some very serious soul searching, and major realignment of loyalties. By 1998, Jewish control of the then "democratic" Russia was painfully obvious as Yeltsin and the parliament installed a Jewish Prime Minister, Sergei Kirijenko..... while it was common knowledge there that the king maker calling the shots was actually Boris Berezovsky....a Jewish godfather with wealth estimated in 1997 to be three billion dollars, making this "Russian" one of the richest men in the world ....presiding over a European country now facing impoverishment. What is more telling still was the forced resignation of this Jewish prot�g� after his failure to cope with Russia's economic chaos...suggesting that Zionist power is no longer ascendant, but rather forced to fall back on the tried and failed communist system of the past. It is noteworthy that Kirijenko was replaced as Prime Minister by the ageing former KGB spymaster Yevgeny Primakov. I was half surprised to hear on Pierce�s American Dissident Voices Internet broadcast of 9-19-98 ("A Confluence of Crises") that Primakov is also a Jew. The implications of this development were so significant that it was necessary to confirm this observation for myself. I found the following document on the Internet: Yevgeny Maksimovich Primakov: Academician & Foreign Minister whose agenda will contravene the West by Joseph G. Lukowski ("For Politics of Post-Soviet Russia CPOL 563 Final Paper, Pentagon, Washington, D.C.,December 1996"). This is clearly an authoritative research document of about ten pages intended for use by main stream academic and political analysts, specifically those at the Pentagon; it contains about four pages of references to prominent Russian and English language sources. Lukowski states: "Yevgeny Maksimovich Primakov was born in Kiev, Ukraine, on October 29,1929, and spent most of his youth growing up in Tblisi, Georgia. He was born to Jewish parents, and before entering the prestigious Institute of Oriental Studies in Moscow, he changed his name to "Primakov," which, in Ukranian, means "stepson." He graduated from the Institute in 1953, and he entered Moscow State University, where he received a doctorate in Economic Sciences in 1956. He later joined the Communist Party in 1959." Primakov was supposedly sympathetic to the Arabs, and well known as an official critic of Israel and Nato. He played the cold war con-game in positions of real responsibility most of his life ....a man carrying a great deal of worn-out baggage � and KGB guilt. In May 1999, Primakov was removed from the office of Prime Minister and replaced by another former head of the secret police: Sergei Stepashin ...an obedient enforcer of the orders handed down by Yeltsin�s higher-ups ...and no intellectual in his own "rite". The implications and complications of Russia�s instability indicate that the credibility of Jewish leadership is not sufficient to repress the discontents of simmering Slavic nationalism. Stepashin�s declared mission was not to personally rescue the economy as Kirijenko and Primakov attempted to do, but to take far more aggressive measures to fight political fire-storms challenging what is left ..and right ..of an un-renewed order. By January 1, 2000 Stepashin and Yeltsin would be gone and quickly forgotten ...both replaced by another Berezovsky man: Vladimir Putin, who would receive the needed media support to be elected president a few months later. Clearly, efforts will be made to re-establish a Russian strongman that is merely superficially antagonistic to Jewish interests ....a Berezovsky-style cabal that evidently is turning once again to ruling through its statues. But even Berezovsky's control is uncertain in a country so unstable as Russia. By December 2000, Jewish media barons Berezovsky and Gusinsky would be at apparent odds with Putin and living in luxurious exile in the West. It seems unlikely that western nations will turn over Jewish media billionaires to face Russian justice, if there is such a thing. It may all be just a show to boost Putin's credibility with the military -- on the other hand, the destruction of a fully-manned Russian submarine and a media tower inferno lead one to wonder if real power plays are being made. If so, who is running Russia and why are the god-fathers on the lamb? Any authentic threat to Jewish hegemony in Russia will result in a very real confrontation with both the Masters of the West and everybody�s short-timer friend from the East: China.

It is very relevant to notice the failure of Jewish genius to accomplish what has been the most important objective of physics since the 1940s -- the failure to sustain a controlled fusion reaction. The implications of this are fathomless for all of us because of the possibility such a technology would open for preserving the Earth's environment, while providing an inexhaustible supply of cheap energy for the future. It was geniuses like Einstein, Bohr, Oppenheimer, Teller, Szilard, Fermi, Feynman, Bohm, Weinberg and the rest who were charged with this mission during their watch, during their century in command. The late 1990�s have been years of extraordinary financial prosperity for the West. Popular movies could easily require budgets over a hundred million dollars, and some turned out profits in the hundreds of millions... one movie even approaching a billion dollars. In 1997, the U.S. Congress approved $232 million for fusion energy research at America's leading academic and scientific facilities. Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory was expected to be a major recipient of that funding, receiving something in the range of $50 million. Consider that in 2002 the funding levels remain virtually unchanged. Notice the tone of the following statement from BusinessWeek (March 18, 2002): �And despite fusion-research budgets in the U.S. of upwards of $250 million a year, scientists say they could use even more.�18A These people are supporting fusion research about as enthusiastically as Bush and the Congress are defending America�s borders. I believe it is possible for genuine scientists to make significant progress in fusion research, and would like to believe that recent reports of tabletop �sonofusion� signal that breakthrough has been achieved by a group of engineers, not nuclear physicists, working outside the fusion establishment � but I fear that it is just more show-business, perhaps serving to boost the morale of Wall Street. Entrenched interests would be threatened by genuine innovation, and could be relied upon to suppress it. Why? How about nightmares of a tabletop hydrogen bomb ..designed for shoestring budgets and easy construction by any �bund� of precocious graduate students with access to nuclear material? Talk about nuclear weapons proliferation!! Many universities around the world do participate in fusion research, and occasionally the media offers a glimmer of hope... that the genie of fusion has been contained within a magnetic bottle; but it is evident that, whether hot or cold, funding for fusion has not been in the same league as the military budgets of the United States and its communist/capitalist allies. Any guesses as to how many trillions of dollars have been spent on nuclear missiles and supporting military weaponry during this post-Hiroshima period of Pax Judaica?..... And how many trillions of dollars are needed to clean up the environmental damage this technology-from-hell has produced? If fusion research is receiving secret funding, as was done with the Manhattan Project, is it likely to be for military applications? Meanwhile, energy and environmental problems will become jarring actualities within a generation or two, if not in our own time. This is the legacy of Weinberg's coldly impersonal materialistic physical science. Amidst the Nobel honors and guilty compensation our race showers upon them, the Jews discredit their own scientific genius by the meanness of their dreams. The nobility of a people's Spirit is as important as their creative brilliance. It is here where the Jews have fallen. It is not that they were lacking in ability, but rather afflicted by a crooked, twisted frame of mind ...curved -- warped like some four-dimensional space-time. They seem to really believe that a deceptive merciless force is the greatest power in existence, that nothing can withstand the shrewd endowment of that fearful bent, not even Nature. At least to some degree, they must be correct .... As we can see, Nature is dying. But what does it profit man to destroy the Earth? You can understand why the Church, of centuries past, saw them as satanic. Instead of devoting their extraordinary creative talent to the pursuit of the truly worthy goal of nuclear fusion, they became consumed with the ambition of producing tens of thousands of ever more contaminating nuclear fission weapons -- to structure world economies and political order around this corrupted vision of science. This is the most enduring boon they bestow upon humanity, and the greatest threat to their own established world empire. Believers in the "infinite potential" of Jewish genius might consider the consequences of their distorted ambitions. What I wish to suggest is that their hostility, and determination to rule in secret --- to maintain classical control of everything, interfered with environmentally sustainable advances in technology. I do not believe that science is inherently harmful to life on this fragile planet, but under the command of the Jews it has been; and this tells us more about the Jews than about science. It should also tell us something essential about ourselves: we cannot allow vengefulness and greed to dominate our common Soul as has happened with them. I do not say this out of Christian piety, but out of natural necessity. As we become increasingly dependent on science because of the irreversible harm already done to this Earth, it is critical that we approach technology with a creative Spirit rather than a destructive one. I believe that there is greater power in the creative genius of a free people than in the programmed totalitarian world State. This organic view being proposed is more consistent with the advance of science than the mechanistic controls of classical autocrats. The Africans in our midst may doubt the sincerity of the suggestion that they take full responsibility for the African continent. But they are mistaken to doubt the conviction here that freedom and challenge are the solution to our horrendous problems, and not the imperial control of other peoples. Making others into slaves necessitates that we be their masters or executioners; but the central problem of modern theoretical physics is this master-mentality.... this determination to control everything.....to rule. And it is here that we strike upon the limits of Jewish genius, and disclose their greatest weakness ...the source of their failures. You should be able to understand now that we can no longer follow in their footsteps. So abandoning vengefulness and controlling greed is essential for the rise of collective genius in the world. To the mechanistic mind, it is impossible to imagine that Nature may conceal Her greatest power in creative beauty. How can a simple flower, a drop of pure water, or One Word of Truth be more powerful than the iron fist? This is the resolution Tolkien failed to discover when he concluded that the ring of power is ultimately evil, and is best thrown away. We cannot abdicate our creative genius. On the contrary, Nature bids us to pursue our own quantum-relativistic identity, not as individuals or any chosen master race, but as what we are ....to fulfill our homespun dreams. It is not a crime against Nature to preserve and concentrate our racial integrity... although such dedication is now judged to be an infraction against the multiracial State. Preservation of our extractions is our-calling, the passageway to our collective genius. The Jews have understood this principle of noble husbandry from the biblical age of Noah ...making it a sacred duty among themselves, while condemning the same instinct in all other tribes. In setting themselves, along with their God, above all others, they have failed to reconcile ruthless ambition with Nature's gambit: that masters can never be free men.

The temptation is to institutionalize power, in every dimension. Those who would rule want their authority to be unchallenged, to be permanent ...but Nature is governed by change, chance ...and not the security or certainty of a final reality. Einstein will be remembered for his theories of relativity, and his critical insight into the wave/particle duality of light, which is central to quantum theory. But according to Einstein's theories, the universe is static; however, he was forced to change this perspective when, in 1929, Hubble discovered that the universe is expanding. "Einstein's static universe was a dead duck and its inventor later regretted the introduction of the cosmological constant to sustain a static universe, calling it 'the biggest blunder of my life'...".19A Einstein was to go on to greater failures, losing face in his one man battle against quantum physics and most notably -- failing to discover a unified field theory. Davies and Brown ask Peierls if he thinks Einstein was totally mistaken in defending the belief that reality is something which exists objectively and is discovered by observation. "I think so. Despite the enormous respect we all have for Einstein for the many things he discovered in physics, we have to accept that he was not willing to adjust himself to the implications of quantum mechanics."20A Peierls states that many very competent physicists have spent more than half a century trying to reconcile this matter of objective reality with quantum physics and they have failed to do so. The consequence is that we are compelled to do away with the traditional concept of reality Einstein was supporting, and attune our relativistic convictions to quantum uncertainty instead.

Much as Christians await the certainty of "the second coming", Hawking and others count on the discovery of a final theory; but Feynman did not share their expectation. He saw Einstein and many lesser physicists waste much of their lives looking for just such a handle on reality. He did not think a theory of everything was just around the corner.21A While rapt in the transport of creative genius, Einstein did his Nobel prize winning research into the photoelectric effect, studied Brownian motion, and developed his theory of special relativity. It was during this time "we find that his style is to avoid complicated mathematics and stress simple physical arguments that get to the heart of the phenomenon in question."22A Later, his approach to mathematics changed as he became deeply involved in ideas of curved four dimensional space-time with respect to gravitation. He became so convinced of the value of advanced mathematical theories, after his success with the general theory of relativity, that he then spent the remainder of his life searching for a mathematical formulation that would do the same for his unified field theory, which he hoped would integrate the forces of gravity and electromagnetism. Keep in mind that Newton did not simply go looking to mathematicians for help in working out his problems in mechanics. Newton created the mathematical calculus needed for physics. To compare Einstein to Newton seems to me to be inappropriate. Some may believe he did not even measure up to his greatest rival: Neils Bohr.

Bohr had greater dignity and aloofness than Einstein. I believe his coming from a Jewish banking family and having close ties to the Soviet Union was too obvious to make public knowledge. He and his son worked at Los Alamos in the construction of the atom bomb; Bohr enraged both Churchill and Roosevelt for his open efforts to share nuclear secrets with his Stalinist comrades -- nor were they ready to appreciate open preaching of his doctrine that world peace could be attained through fear of the bomb. Bohr took bold action when necessary and left the cover-up for lesser minds to worry about. In my opinion, Bohr was more significant than Einstein, but also more vulnerable to public scrutiny. So the humble little Swiss watchmaker ran interference for the Bohr of wealth and privilege, who worked in the top secret shadows where real power prefers to remain concealed -- Sheltered from the demands and expectations of more regimented authorities, so that he might find time to re-shape all their realities ...from the ground up ..fall-out ..beneath their feet. Before a building is constructed, blueprints are made. A physical design is based on mathematics, especially geometry. Before an organization is established, a flow chart is drawn up laying out the underlying structure of the system. Ultimately, every system's architecture can be traced back to mathematics. In the practical world, mathematical theory is first applied in physics, then engineering, chemistry, biology, medicine, ....social sciences such as political science, economics, sociology, psychology ...and eventually, even people in business and the humanities fall in line. My argument is that you will find the same basic theoretical structure, the same template, underlying twentieth century power politics as one finds in physics. I am convinced that it was Bohr's thinking, more so than Einstein's, that shaped the cold-world-order, which we have understood was not actually adversarial (Wallerstein), but complementary. Can you doubt the connection between capitalism and communism today? Look at the seriousness of mutual commitment between communist/capitalist China and capitalist/communist America. By studying quantum theory, as Neils Bohr defined it, we can begin to understand the structure of the political world. When the Jews find a formula that works, they use it everywhere, and often -- for centuries. Bohr's principle of complementarity permeates quantum physics, yet Bohr made a rule that statements in physics must be expressed in a single tract logical form. The intuitive expectation would be that as with complex numbers, problems in quantum physics would disclose complementarity through and through. Bohr was obsessed with complementarity, and not likely to abandon this central idea in his thinking when it came time to formulate fundamental problems -- especially if an architecture of complementarity would resolve conflicts and make quantum theory more consistent within itself. I believe it was politically necessary to prevent scientists all over the world from recognizing the illusory ...the imaginary dimension to scientific paradoxes, not only in physics but especially farther down the line in disciplines such as political science. How long would it take for outsiders to see complementarity in their cold war world, and make the obvious observation that Walllerstein reported in his book Geopolitics and Geoculture? And more importantly, what would the consequences be when ordinary people understood that the cold war was a "necessary illusion" institutionalized by governments voters supposedly chose in free elections?

Creative physicists have taken thought-experiments very seriously since the days of Schr�dinger's cat, and the imaginative duels between Einstein and Bohr. But a thought experiment is just another name for philosophy. Increasingly, computer wizardry, mathematics, and philosophy have come to replace laboratory experiments in the new physics. Quantum theory is largely based on "thought experiments"; it is a very meaningful and understandable philosophy, and those who created it knew this very well because they got many of their ideas from mystical philosophers. The fantasy cats and multiple universes were introduced to confuse curious physicists, and ensure they remain safely boxed up in their bureaucratic mechanical specializations. I hope to awaken these "live-dead" scientists from their quantum state of suspended animation. The illusions which are implemented by the magicians of tyranny to enslave us can be better understood as practical social applications of quantum theory and relativity. The most powerful idea of the twentieth century has been the search for a theory of everything. Einstein spent the later half of his life trying to develop a unified field theory. Many scientists have followed in his quest over the past 60 years. However, the social incarnation of this grand ambition is recognizable as totalitarianism. People are too fearful to understand a power structure that has them surrounded, perhaps imprisoning and executing millions. By making everyone specialists, intelligent people have been prevented from recognizing the "deep structure" pervading the social order of the world in which they live. While one cannot penetrate minds petrified by fear, it is possible to explain relativity, illusion, quantum theory, chaos, and theories of everything ....because people have been taught to admire scientific theorists like Einstein and Bohr. Once people have some understanding of modern scientific thinking, it is possible to show that the totalitarian world structure, which is characterized by the illusions of the media, has the same basic characteristics as the new physics; there is self-similarity manifesting a common design throughout the entire post-war civilization. The people who created the social structure of our political world were the self-same individuals who created the new physics. You can recognize the minds of Bohr and Einstein in the complementarity of the cold war theater used to justify patriotic support for this totalitarian "old world order". They were both very political, and thinking precisely along these lines of complementarity, as well as searching for a theory of everything --- just as the totalitarian US/USSR illusory cold war emerged.23A

The waning of the twentieth century totalitarian order, which had been rooted in a duality of super-powers called "the cold war", may be linked to the failures of both Bohr and Einstein to resolve the paradoxes troubling their theories. What they did was to compromise their ideas with an artificial pragmatism necessitated by classical worldly power -- and this approach is not exactly the stuff of enduring genius. But there was so much adulation for Einstein and Bohr among the Jewish elite that the faithful could not believe that the ideas of their collective genius would fail them. So these true-believers chose to follow the patterns of thought established by these messianic warriors like a ritual formula ...the design of an imperium encompassing everything -- totalitarianism. However, as the application of these ideas, and the environmental impact of their new science played out during the twentieth century, the flaws in the thinking of these mortal geniuses became more apparent. Social engineers were replacing quantum uncertainty with the control mentality of classical physics. They failed to account for the chaotic forces in society, and this was a fatal oversight. But it was too late to fix the "old world order" ... the cold war that had been carved in the stone Gulags of Siberia. It was the certainty of their "thousand year Reich" that gave them the confidence to condemn untold numbers of White Europeans to frozen mass graves without fear of justice. As the tiny vibrations of initial conditions became overwhelming chaotic disturbances, the empire built by the towering faculty of Jewish genius began to crack, and that minor detail of history..... the expendable Russian aristocracy and middle class, broke out of the petrified statistics of Soviet bureaucracy into the living consciousness of an outside world fearful to believe the records of the recent past. Only now is the magnitude of that atrocity reaching any level of credibility, as we recognize the possibility of comparable events materializing in our own societies. The unthinkable abstraction of history hits home like a megaton of frost-bite. The growing possibilities of the nuclear winter of Russian discontent offers no comfort to those sweltering in the flaming heat of a hellish global warming.

What are the consequences when both ancient and modern methods of subversion come to light -- become common knowledge? It is not easy for any Pharisee Wiseman to dream-up alternatives for complementarity, relativity, and quantum theory. Not many understand these concepts yet, and far fewer can think beyond them. Ideas like these persist in a culture; they are about as hard to overcome as the popular belief in God, time, the self, and reality. Elites have no choice but to resort to the use of fear and brutal force when it becomes evident they have run out of truly creative ideas; and this is a losing position because it makes them visible, vulnerable, and predictable ....fostering fear, anger, and rebellion. The merciless force of Stalinism has it's weaknesses. During the Soviet years, the communists killed-off too many intelligent and courageous people. This left unquestioning party liners in charge of very dangerous matters, such as nuclear waste disposal and nuclear weapons control. These Mafia hit-men got their jobs because they were communists not because they were technical wizards; political correctness smacks of this same mentality in America today. That system broke down because of the incompetence of the proletariat, and the enduring monument to this fact is the devastation of their here-too-fore beautiful and immensely wealthy environment. Once the human being is converted into an aggressive party-line enforcer, the flexibility of thought essential to creative genius is sacrificed. When intelligence is sold-out for the perks of Party life, thought invariably becomes manipulative and loses its creative value ....limiting the brilliance even of an Einstein or a Bohr. The State cannot program TV minds and expect the same people to function imaginatively in solving immensely complex real world problems, or even deal with lesser tragedies that might set them at odds with the Mob. Their thinking becomes official, compartmentalized, specialized, standardized.....absolutely safe -- because they know the penalties for stepping out of line. If you ever encountered the authorities from the communist cell blocks of the Soviet Union decades ago, you get my point. These travel agents for Air Siberia had the same answer to every creative suggestion: "impossible".... the same answer you will get today, in North America and Europe, if you request any academic, minister, journalist, or government representative to honestly discuss in public the ideas raised in these pages. The communist dogma of equality justified the murder of millions who didn�t seem equal enough to suit the proletariat of the Soviet Union. To question this same Orwellian dogma of equality in contemporary America is unthinkable ...criminal. When combined with the principle of a State enforced multiracial society, this communist creed of equality becomes a weapon clearly targeting the rapidly diminishing White majority of America. Affirmative action indicates that equality is merely a cover for the State�s real objective: an assault on White folks not sporting the correct Party colors. Anyone willing to confront history cannot escape the striking similarities between anti-bourgeoisie Marxist ideas which materialized in the extermination of the East European aristocracies and middle classes, and the aggressive Media-State campaigns assaulting White communities in the West today. Pushers of "brotherhood" and "love" are making a serious mistake refusing to understand their part in this historic crime against the White middle class. Ignorance is no defense for "brothers" and "sisters" who know very well what is going on -- they get along just fine with the very rich and powerful; it is against safe targets ...against ordinary Whites unprotected by the State ...against us whom they direct their grievances. By ratifying the capitalist/communist Super-State of forced choices, people of color become accomplices in this second genocidal assault upon the White race, thus endorsing the atrocities committed in the first and entangling themselves in a non-local conflict of far greater intensity than their own actions would seem to merit.

The model for multiracial America developed thus far has been the multiracial Soviet Union. That system failed, but there is another that has not! How will the Zionists in the West deal with the problem of incompetence resulting from their multiracial society? It is inevitable that what they must do is first mix talented whites with blacks. But something more will be needed to run the high tech complex society they have in mind. They need undiluted intellect, but where can they find it in sufficient numbers? The failure to do so must lead to the same result that afflicted the Soviet Union: collapse. Thus, they must turn to the Chinese model! These new arrivals will outperform their multiracial competitors in complex mathematical skills. The result will not be proof of racial equality, but the racial primacy of the fittest. Blacks in the West who imagine they are secure in this multiracial system must have the courage to see the shape of things to come: their replacements � and ours: the Chinese. Destroying the White race will not elevate Blacks to the level of �equality�. In one form or another, the reality of genius will trump the dogma of equality.

The two-faced hands of pacifist "idealism" are played out ...compelling wise-guys too make some hard-time commitments. Submission to the "New World Order" will not be as profitable for the shrewd opportunistic "idealists" as it was back in the 60's and 70's. Being the "life of the party" will definitely not be the blast it was in those fun loving days of liberalism when behaving like a machine wasn't part of the script. Since those days of trusting church goers, pop culture has replaced the Christian Madonna with a plastic porno-queen. The objective has been to corrupt the White youth, to absorb them into the multi-racial mass culture of perverted "love", addiction, and infection. The destruction of age-old wisdom prepares the way for half the children of the middle class to slide into the undifferentiated jungle of the mixed race masses of the world, in another divide and conquer attack on dwindling White populations. Losers will be governed by the mass-media-rules of a capitalist/communist machine. Europeans have seen these same totalitarian techniques used by communists for over fifty years. The sheltered life of the middle class will be a distant memory drowned out by the harsh tones of heavy metal. The only solace to be found will be in the newly legalized hard drugs. Abortion and euthanasia will be rights guaranteed to all ...fully endorsed by Church and State. Anyone critical of these newly endowed "ideals" will be branded extremist and a potential terrorist. This is not a picture of some distant future that threatens our retirement; this is what is happening today in America. But attachment to wealth prevents Christian cowards from acting forcefully -- even in the defense of our own little sons and daughters. Practical men reach the limits of reason, and suffer a loss of courage, when witnessing the full power of totalitarian rulers.... who control the present through the media, past history through education, and a high tech vision of the future through politics and science. My concern is that Orwellian secret police are likely leaders of those attempting to oppose tyranny. Double cross-stars are the double-agent trademark of totalitarianism that makes it so horrifying. A State-of-illusion takes bows in the light of day, but the terror of its shadow is cast upon those who would rule the night. We feel damned, hypnotized in 1984... a surrealist place where time is paralyzed, and hope is non-existent. Submission is the course of inaction so many choose; but there is another path, a perilous one that leads out of this suicidal despair, but it is not one that can be made easy for those primed to hit on a quick fix. That journey stretches out before you.....

No promise of final truth can be offered. No image of God can be painted. But enlightenment is truly possible, and this is what we instinctively seek, even though we may not be conscious of the searching. Nietzsche's madman is forever seeking God: Being ... out of time. No "self" survives the intensity of this experience, for it wipes clear the slate of human consciousness more thoroughly than madness ever could. Illusion discloses the contradictions in our perceptions and the limits to common sense reason.....pounding upon the boundaries of human understanding. Our method of thinking, our consciousness is called into question, like the doubting of someone's sanity. Our compulsion is to complete the picture, to know everything from beginning to end -- creation to the apocalypse. This, in truth, is not available to us, however sincerely we may be ready to believe in the "Good Book". Seeing......... through illusion......... leads us to accept not knowing the answers to everything; but this is not the "not knowing" of logical reason. It is the "knot knowing" of mysticism: the acceptance of transcendence that is not on the rational ladder. We come not to final answers, but to the suspension of reasoning self-consciousness. The final truth is not discovered. Awareness is! Atheism is grounded in self-consciousness, and naively disavows the existence of a transcendent intelligence, while not questioning the simplistic self that would measure the universe by the primitive yardstick of a mechanistic logic. There is no reason for science and spirituality to be contradictory when both call the subjective observer into question. It is necessary to live with incomplete knowledge. It is painful to imagine a world without the continuity of my self-consciousness, but that fact must be accepted. The human condition must remain unfinished -- open, so that there might be a past as well as a future.

Rise and fall of Roman Catholic Church: revisionist history

                                        

                                      END NOTES 

3.Microsoft � Encarta � 97 Encyclopedia,  Totalitarianism � 1993-1996 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

4.Ibid.

5.Ibid.

6.Ibid.

7.The Associated Press,  Holocaust Museum Cancels Speech,  AP 6-Feb-1997 20:19 EST REF5930, Copyright1997.Based on an article by Deb Riechmann from Washington.

8.Weinberg, Steven, Dreams of a Final Theory: The Search for the Fundamental Laws of Nature  � 1993 Vintage, London p.108   

9A.Weinberg, p.111   

9B.Weinberg, p.169

10.Bohm, David and F. David Peat, Science, Order and Creativity  � 1987 Bantam Books, New York , pp.235-236  

11.Davies, Paul and John Gribbin, The Matter Myth: Beyond Chaos and Complexity  � 1992 Penguin Books, London, p.22    

12.Shockley, William, Deviations from Hardy-Weinberg Frequencies Caused by Assortative Mating in Hybrid Populations (assortative Caucasian-Negro mating/variance of Caucasian admixture/California Negroes)  Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Science USA  70 (1973), pp. 732-36.   

13.Wallerstein, Immanuel,  Geopolitics and Geoculture: Essays on the Changing World-System  � 1991 Cambridge University Press, England, p.6

14.Wallerstein, p 7.  

15.Davies and  Gribbin, p.202  

16.Wallerstein, pp.10-11  

17.Peat, F. David,  Infinite Potential: The Life and Times of David Bohm � 1997 Addison-Wesley, New York, p.57

18A.BusinessWeek (March 18, 2002) Science & Technology: Is It Really Fusion This Time? (By Otis Port)   

19A.Barrow, John D.,Theories of Everything:The Quest for Ultimate Explanations � 1991 Astronomy Centre, University of Sussex,Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp.103-4

20A.Davies, P.C.W. and J.R. Brown (Editors), The Ghost In The Atom � 1993 Cambridge University Press, Canto Edition, Cambridge, pp.75-76

21A.Gleick, James, Genius: Richard Feynman and Modern Physics � 1992 Little, Brown and Company (UK) Limited, London, pp.432-3

22A.Barrow,Theories of Everything:The Quest for Ultimate Explanations , p.180

23A.Weinberg, Steven, Dreams of a Final Theory: The Search for the Fundamental Laws of Nature ,Vintage � 1993, London, p.13